CORONAVIRUS UPDATE: The library is closed effective Tuesday, March 24th. Continuing services will include: access to online materials; reference, class or research consultations; and assistance with securing expanded online access to curriculum-based and/or research materials. For more information see the Georgetown Libraries COVID-19 Updates and Resources page and the Library's COVID-19 FAQ.
The brutal fact becomes increasingly clear. The "oldest American
prejudice," as anti-Catholicism has rightly been called, is as poisonously
alive today as it was in 1928, or in the Eighteen Nineties or even in the
Eighteen Forties. Its source is the same, political and religious ignorance.
Its result is the same, a disastrous confusion of politics and religion.
Only one difference is discernible. Now the ancient "anti-Papist" text
is embellished by a new set of footnotes. This is the single concession to the
current climate, which has altered in only one respect. Today even religious
prejudice feels the need somehow to contrive for itself the semblance of
rationality. The footnotes, of course, prove none of the time-worn
anti-Catholic charges in the text; they merely serve to cloak the prejudice
that long ago wrote the text.
Can the religious issue be outlawed from the campaign? Obviously not. It
is itself an outlaw thing that defies the laws of rational politics.
Will the oldest American prejudice be dissipated during the campaign?
Again, obviously not. It may well decide the issue.
My chief hope is that old Catholic angers will not rise, as the ancient
anti-Catholic text, with its new footnotes, is endlessly recited.
Now, if ever, is the time for the tradition of reason, which is the
Catholic tradition, to assert itself. Only in its assertion is there hope for
some health in American politics.